Google+ Followers

Thursday, 22 March 2018

Ahed Tamimi – Palestinian girl 17 receives 8 months for slapping armed soldier

Elor Azaria, who murdered an unconscious wounded Palestinian is released also after 8 months


Ahed Tamimi was yesterday sentenced to 8 months imprisonment for slapping a soldier who entered the grounds of her house. Ahed Tamimi, who has become a heroine of the Palestinian resistance, was filmed slapping an Israeli soldier who entered the grounds of her house. She was perfectly entitled under International Law to resist a soldier from Israel's Occupation.  But of course under the military dictatorship that Palestinians live under Ahed was guilty since Israel pays no heed to international law.

As she was led away to begin her sentence she shouted 'There is no Justice Under Occupation'.  Even during her pre-trial hearings Ahed retained her sense of humour.  Asked by the Military Judge how she hit the solder she said, 'take off these handcuffs and I'll show you.'  I have written extensively on this and you may wish to refer to my previous articles:

“Stone Cold Justice“ - Israeli kidnapping, detention, torture and abuse of Palestinian children - Australian TV Broadcast

Jewish Chronicle Hits a New Low - A Vile Article Attacking 16 year old Ahed Tamimi

Ahed Tamimi’s arrest sheds a disturbing light on how children are targeted by Israel

Ahed Tamimi's lawyer: Her case is making people see the occupation again, Torture couldn’t happen to a Jewish child - 16 year old Ahed Tamimi’s Detention is Extended by Israel's Military Court

Immediately the video of Ahed standing up to the soldiers went viral, there were calls from the racist Education Minister Naftali Bennett for her to 'finish her life in prison'.

The Israeli army kidnapped Ahed in the middle of the night, video photographer accompanying them, awakening her in her house in the early hours of the morning and thus began a 3 month ordeal in which more charges were added to the bill of indictment.

She was prosecuted in a Military Court which has a 99.74% conviction rate.  In reality she is being tried by the same army that has arrested and brutalised her.  Unlike Israeli children she has no protection, access to parents, social workers etc.  She is, like in Nazi Germany, the untermenschen and is treated accordingly.
Caspit, the 'liberal' Israeli journalist called for 'a price to be exacted' against Ahed, 'in the dark, without witnesses or cameras'  He denies that he meant rape or sexual assault but, as Mandy Rice Davies said, he would wouldn't he?'
 She was subject to what amounted to calls to rape and sexually assault her by prominent Ma’ariv journalist Ben Caspit who wrote in Maariv:
 “in the case of the girls, we should exact a price at some other opportunity, in the dark, without witnesses and cameras”
Ahed caught the imagination of people world wide and Israel's hasbara propaganda machine couldn't keep up.  Instead of a Palestinian in traditional Arab garb with a headscarf, she was an engaging white teenager with blonde hair and an endearing smile.  
The kinda kid next door that people can empathise with.  

The idiot of a former Ambassador to the USA and now a government minister, Michael Oren couldn't accept this.  It was a 'fake family' she was deliberately dressed by her parents in western clothes.  Apparently there had been an investigation into the Tamimi family two years ago to establish if they were a real family!
As in South Africa under Apartheid or in the Deep South under Jim Crow the penalty for killing a Palestinian is always less than killing the herrenvolk, a Jew
But as her ordeal dragged on even the Israeli army realised that Israel has suffered massive PR damage.  Their treatment of a young Palestinian girl compared to what an Israeli child would experience is so obviously unjust that you would have to be a particularly thick Zionist to not notice.

That is why Fadi Quoran's article below is correct.  Israel's military prosecutors had originally intended to put Ahed away for years. They dug up false allegations from years ago but the scale of the international campaign has forced the bastards to back off.  In the end holding Ahed was a liability they wanted to be shot of.  All the weapons in the world were to no avail against a young girl's courage.

We should treat this as a victory and Ahed herself as a hero.  As a 17 year old girl under massive & enormous pressure she refused to answer any questions or co-operate in any way.  What a contrast between the Quisling of the Palestinian Authority  Mahmoud Abbas in Ramallah and Ahed Tamimi.

The case has shone a light on Israel’s Injustice System.  Hence the Israeli military judge decided, against the pleas of the family, that she would be tried in secret as befits a police state.  She and her parents were opposed to this because they wanted the light of publicity to expose these racists.

The Military Court decided that the court hearing should be held in secret not for Ahed's benefit but to save their own embarrassment.  The army were happy to video her arrest as a way of asuaging the racist Right in Israel but they didn't want the publicity that came with her continued detention.

Of course if a closed trial had  really been for her benefit then she would never have been incarcerated in the first place, still less held in pre-trial detention.  The lies just keep pouring off the Zionist PR machine.  

Israel, like all settler states, is essentially stupid.  The cries for revenge against Ahed resounded in Israel but people abroad could not understand the Biblical vengeance being exacted against a female David.  It was as if the story of David and the slingshot was being reversed with Goliath demanding his pound of flesh.

Racist murderer Elor Azaria receives the same sentence as Ahed - Palestinian life is cheap
Contrast her case with Israeli murderer Elor Azaria.  He shot a severely wounded Palestinian in the head whilst he was on the ground.  This supporter of the Jewish Nazi Kach movement was sentenced to 18 months imprisonment, which was reduced twice and he was eventually let out after serving little over 8 months.  In other words the same sentence as Ahed who is unlikely to have her sentence cut. 

You can be sure that this murderous psychopath, who was a hero before he went into prison, was treated like a hero when he was inside.  Ahed's treatment by all accounts will be nasty and violent and it is a tribute to her and the hundreds of Palestinian children that they bear it with fortitude. 

Labour MPs Louise Ellman and Ian Austin Who Support Israeli Child Abuse Should be Expelled

A month ago I was expelled from the Labour Party because I called the execrable Blairite MP Louise Ellman a supporter of Israeli child abuse.  The idiot of a barrister, Thomas Ogg, said that I was shaming her.  Indeed I was and I intend to continue doing so.

To be fair to Ellman and I always try to be fair (!) she was joined by another Labour MP who should go, the detestable right-winger Ian Austin MP, the man who heckled Jeremy Corbyn in the debate on the Chilcott Report.  Let us hope that his CLP gets rid of him.

Below is a graphic of the contributions of these two supporters of Palestinian child abuse
Both these racists, Ellman and Austin believe that  Palestinian children are 'incited' to throw stones at the soldiers who occupy their homes and steal their land.  This is of course what every imperialist has argued throughout history.  The oppressed would love their oppressors but for the 'inciters'.  The real disgrace is that these 2 creatures are still members of the Labour Party
I have included a number of different reactions as this is an extremely important case.  The issue of Israel's child prisoners should be highlighted continuously.

This is Israeli justice – slapping a heavily armed soldier is equivalent to killing a wounded Palestinian

21 March 2018
Press Release - for immediate publication

Ahed Tamimi’s forced plea bargain clearly illustrates role of military juvenile court:

Protecting the occupation, not Palestinian minors
The conviction rate in Israel’s military courts in the West Bank is almost 100% - not because the military prosecution is so efficient, but because Palestinian defendants reluctantly sign plea bargains in which they plead guilty. A new report published yesterday by B’Tselem shows how the measures that Israel has showcased over the last decade as examples of its improved treatment of Palestinian minors in military courts have little to do with the protection of minors and everything to do with public relations. In fact, the function of the military juvenile court boils down to signing off on plea bargains such as the one signed today.
This afternoon, the military court at Ofer signed off on plea bargains for ‘Ahed and Nariman Tamimi. The plea bargains include eight months in prison and a fine. A new report published yesterday by B’Tselem, Minors in Jeopardy: Violation of the Rights of Palestinian Minors by Israel’s Military Courts, analyzes the changes that Israel declared over the last decade with regard to the treatment of Palestinian minors in military courts. The report reveals that while useful in Israeli propaganda, these technical changes have done nothing to improve the protection of minors’ rights.

In particular, the role of the Military Juvenile Court, whose establishment Israel views as a landmark achievement in the protection of minors’ rights in the military court system, is primarily to sign off on plea bargains already reached between the defense and the prosecution outside the courtroom. Almost all minors sign the plea bargains, having been left little choice by the military courts’ detention policy: most minors are held in custody from the time of their arrest and until they finish serving their sentence. Carrying out an evidentiary trial from within prison is fraught with difficulties, and the defendants know that if convicted, they will be sentenced to prison anyway, as no alternatives exist. Even in the extremely unlikely case that they are acquitted, the time they spent in custody throughout the trial may be just as long, or even longer, than the time they will spend in prison under a plea bargain.
‘Ahed Tamimi’s case is exceptional only in that it garnered special media attention, but it is essentially no different from hundreds of such cases every year. According to figures the Israel Prison Service (IPS) provided to B’Tselem, on 28 February 2018 the IPS had 356 Palestinian minors in custody: 95 of them were serving a prison sentence, 257 were in pre- or post- indictment detention, and four were being held in administrative detention. While Israel claims to hold dear the rights of the Palestinian minors it arrests and puts on trial, the opposite is true: the rights of these minors are routinely and systemically abused from the moment of their arrest.                     

In Israeli military courts, Palestinian minors always lose

In Israeli civilian courts, detention is always a last resort for a minor. But when it comes to Palestinian minors in Israeli military courts, prison is almost guaranteed.
By Yael Marom
Ahed Tamimi in the Ofer prison military court. December 20, 2017. (Oren Ziv/Activestills)
Israeli authorities have dedicated significant effort in recent years to highlighting the improvements allegedly made in the treatment of Palestinian minors within Israeli military courts in the West Bank.

Among the ostensible achievements are the establishment a juvenile court in the military court system, allowing for the increased involvement of parents in the military justice system, decreasing the length of time a child can be detained before being brought before a judge, and even an abandoned experiment of issuing summonses to Palestinian minors instead of sending an invading force of soldiers to arrest them in their homes in the middle of the night — the common practice today.

A report published by Israeli human rights group B’Tselem on Tuesday argues that these so-called improvements have improved very little. The juvenile military court system system, which uses the tactic of denying bail to pressure over 70 percent of juvenile defendants and their families into accepting plea bargains, has a startling conviction rate that exceeds 95 percent.

The military juvenile courts do not come close to conforming to international standards and conventions signed and implemented by Israel, according to the B’Tselem report. And Israel’s treatment of Palestinian minors contrasts starkly with the treatment Israeli children receive in Israel’s separate, civilian juvenile justice system.

The Israeli army prosecuted 1,046 Palestinian minors in 2014 and 2015, according to the Association for Civil Rights in Israel. More than a quarter of those indictments were of children 15 and under. Already in the first two months of 2018, the army arrested 274 Palestinian minors who were thrust into the military court system, according to Palestinian human rights group Addameer.

Israeli soldiers arrest a Palestinian youth during a protest against Donald Trump’s recognition of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, Hebron, West Bank, December 7, 2017. (Wisam Hashlamoun/Flash90)
 One of the most disturbing differences between the Israeli civilian and military juvenile justice systems is that in the Israeli system, arrest and pre-conviction detention is supposed to be a last resort; other options are to be exhausted before resorting to imprisonment. In the military system, to which Palestinian children are subjected, pre-conviction detention (denying bail) is the rule; there are virtually no alternatives to detention, and exceptions are extremely rare.

What this means is that Palestinian minor defendants are faced with the following choice: fight the charges and remain in prison for the duration of their trial or sign a plea deal and get a reduced sentence. Considering the time spent in prison awaiting trial, however, even defendants likely to be acquitted still might spend more time behind bars than if they had just signed a plea deal.

One of the testimonies collected by B’Tselem and published in the new report describes what the system looks like from the perspective of a Palestinian teenager:

Abed Sabah, a 15-year-old from the Jalazun refugee camp near Ramallah, was arrested last August. Soldiers broke into his house at 3:00 a.m. without explaining why. He was handcuffed and blindfolded. According to Abed’s testimony, soldiers beat and cursed him during the drive from his home to the military base. He was detained for several hours overnight at the base, handcuffed and tied to a wooden post outside, forbidden from going to the bathroom. The soldiers took him to a police station in the morning. In the interrogation room, he was questioned about stone-throwing and a pipe bomb. The interrogator permitted him to call his parents but not a lawyer. The interrogator never explained Abed’s rights to him, particularly his right to remain silent.

During this first interrogation, the interrogator pressured Abed to confess to the crimes of which he was accused, saying that it would help him. Abed refused. The interrogator wanted Abed to sign two documents in Hebrew, which Abed did not understand and refused to sign. Abed was then moved to the cell for minors at Ofer Prison, and then to the military court there. The entire ordeal was less than 12 hours — but 12 hours during which he was completely alone. There was no one waiting for him in court either — neither his parents nor a lawyer. Abed said he did not know what the purpose of the hearing was, and when the hearing was over, he was sent back to prison.

Two months later he was brought back to court. A lawyer told him he wanted to sign a deal that would include a sentence of two-and-a-half months — exactly the amount of time Abed had already spent in prison. And so it was. Abed’s parents paid a fine of NIS 2,000, and Abed received another five months of probation. At 7:00 p.m. that night, Abed was informed that he was being released. His brother was waiting for him outside of the prison, but the Israeli authorities instead released him at the Ben Sira checkpoint, where no one waiting. Abed said he used a waiting cab driver’s phone to call his brother, who came and took him home.

Israeli soldiers arrest a child during the weekly demonstration in Kfer Qaddum, a West bank village located east of Qalqiliya, on January 25, 2013.
So what about the improvements Israel has made? B’Tselem addresses them one by one.

Did the decision to require bringing minors before a judge sooner actually change the length of time they spend in pre-conviction detention? First of all, remand and bail hearings are not held in the new juvenile military court, so considerations of the child’s wellbeing are rarely raised — the use of detention as a first resort, as opposed to a last resort, has not changed. Secondly, seeing a judge sooner and more frequently has not led to any discernible reduction in the amount of time spent in detention or the ease with which the courts deny bail, according to the report.

Did the change allowing a greater role for defendants’ parents in the juvenile military court system lead to an improvement in advocacy for the child and their best interests? According to B’Tselem, however, the change is almost entirely symbolic, and parental involvement remains minimal. Parents do not have the right to be present during their children’s interrogation, nor does the army actually update parents on the details of their child’s detention.

The biggest problem is that none of the changes have affected the way Palestinian juveniles are arrested, interrogated, and remanded to custody without bail. As long as the system is designed to churn out confessions that lead to plea deals — and the protections for those earlier stages of custody remain unimplemented — reforms to the trial system inside the new juvenile courts will remain virtually moot. Palestinian children rarely stand trial and the merits and circumstances of their confessions are never critically reviewed by a judge.

Yael Marom is Just Vision’s public engagement manager in Israel and a co-editor of Local Call, where a longer version of this article first appeared in Hebrew. Read it here


Ahed Tamimi, 17, became hero to Palestinians after 15 December incident outside her home (AFP)

Thursday 22 March 2018 0:33 UTC

Ahed Tamimi, the teenage Palestinian girl who was filmed kicking and slapping an Israeli soldier in the occupied West Bank, accepted a plea deal on Wednesday under which she will be sentenced to eight months in prison, her lawyer said.

Tamimi, 17, became a hero to Palestinians after the 15 December incident outside her home in the village of Nabi Saleh was streamed live on Facebook by her mother and went viral.

The soldiers had deployed during a weekly Palestinian protest in the village against Israeli policy on settlements in the West Bank, one of the most heated issues in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Tamimi was 16 at the time of the offence. Her trial began last month and she faced 12 charges, including aggravated assault.

"No justice under occupation!" Tamimi, handcuffed and shackled, shouted out to reporters at court in the Ofer military prison, near the West Bank city of Ramallah.

Tamimi's attorney Gaby Lasky said that under the deal approved by the court, Tamimi will plead guilty to a reduced charge sheet that includes assault and would be sentenced to eight months in jail and pay a fine of 5,000 shekels (about $1,430). The Israeli military confirmed the details of the deal.

It broke the stereotyped image of the Palestinian in the international community
- Bassem Tamimi, Ahed's father

Lasky said the jail term included the time Tamimi has spent in detention since her arrest in December.

Tamimi's family are veterans of protests against an Israeli settlement near their home. An Israeli watchtower stands at the entrance to the village and there are often soldiers in the area. Her mother, Nariman, and a cousin were also arrested. Both have accepted plea bargains, a family lawyer said.
"When the European people see my daughter, blonde and blue-eyed, they are shaken, because they saw their children in front of them. It broke the stereotyped image of the Palestinian in the international community," Tamimi's father, Bassem Tamimi told Reuters.

The images of Tamimi striking the soldier had also made an impact on Israelis, who debated whether the officer should have hit back. The army said the soldier “acted professionally” by showing restraint but right-wing politicians described his behavior as humiliating.

"The honour of Israel's army cannot be trampled" Israeli Culture Minister Miri Regev said on her Facebook page after the incident. "We cannot have a situation in which soldiers are humiliated and hit and they do not act at that moment and arrest those who hurt them."

The Israeli army said in a statement after the sentence that it "will continue operating in order to preserve the security and public order in (the West Bank) and enforce the law as it pertains to anyone who harms (Israeli) soldiers and incites violence."
Ahed in court
Tamimi's trial
Tamimi's trial began on 13 February behind closed doors at the Israeli military court in the West Bank.

Lasky appealed to have the trial opened, but was rejected.

The court ordered the trial closed because Ahed was being tried as a minor, as is usual in such cases.

"When they decided to keep her trial behind closed doors, we knew that we were not going to get a fair trial," 

Lasky told AFP in describing her reasons for seeking a plea bargain.

The UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights has criticised Israeli authorities' actions in the case, while the European Union has expressed concern over Israel's detention of minors, including Ahed Tamimi.

When they decided to keep her trial behind closed doors, we knew that we were not going to get a fair trial

Gaby Lasky, Tamimi's father

"Ahed will be home in a few months, but Israel is putting this child behind bars for eight months for calling for protests and slapping a soldier, after threatening her with years in jail," 

Sarah Leah Whitson, executive director of the Middle East division of Human Rights Watch, said in a statement.

Tamimi's family says the 15 December incident that led to the arrests occurred in the yard of their home in Nabi Saleh, near Ramallah in the West Bank.

The Israeli military said the soldiers were in the area to prevent Palestinians from throwing stones at Israeli motorists.

The video shows the cousins approaching two soldiers and telling them to leave before shoving, kicking and slapping them.

The scuffle took place amid clashes and protests against US President Donald Trump's controversial recognition of Jerusalem as Israel's capital.

Palestinians want the West Bank for a future state, along with East Jerusalem and the Gaza Strip. Most countries consider Israeli settlements built on territory Israel captured in the 1967 Middle East war to be illegal.

Israel disputes that its settlements are illegal and says their future should be determined in peace talks with the Palestinians. Negotiations collapsed in 2014 and efforts by the White House to restart them have showed little progress.

Tamimi's case drew global attention. Amnesty International called her the "Rosa Parks of Palestine", and the small courtroom was often packed with journalists, diplomats and international observers during hearings.

A group of American cultural figures, including actors Danny Glover and Rosario Dawson and novelist Alice Walker, signed a petition calling for her release and comparing her case to those of "the children of immigrants and communities of color who face police brutality in the United States".

Three reasons why Israel backed down, and Ahed Tamimi will walk free

The Israeli military was forced to give in and drop 8 of the charges against Ahed as part of a plea bargain, in which Ahed recognized in court the fact that she slapped the soldier and called for protests. In return, Ahed will get the minimum sentence of 8 months instead of spending at least 3 years in prison based on what the military prosecutor was initially seeking. Lawyers at Ofer Military Court told us we would be lucky if they offered a 2 year plea bargain. But now, Ahed will be out in July — early enough to go to her first year in college. For the next 4 months in prison, Ahed will focus on her studies and take her final year exams. Ahed’s mother, Nariman, will also be released at the same time.

The fact that a child will be jailed for 8 months for slapping a soldier whose troops just shot her 15 year old cousin in the face is extreme, but in the context of the 99% conviction rate in the Israeli military court system and right-wing incitement against Ahed, this compromise by the Israeli military shows they have decided to back down in the face of growing pressure to release Ahed. In fact, they were begging Ahed’s lawyer, Gaby Lasky, to accept the plea bargain. 

Below are the 3 main reasons why the Israeli military was forced to back down, and give Ahed the minimum possible sentence:

(1) Ahed refused to be coerced so there wasn’t enough evidence to convict her

Israel subjected Ahed Tamimi to intense military interrogations led by a member of Israel’s military intelligence. The interrogation tactics were meant to coerce her into admitting guilt on the 12 charges brought against her. Detained children, who are often beaten, disoriented, and afraid, end up saying anything the interrogator wants them to — but Ahed courageously maintained her right to remain silent throughout the entire interrogation.

Unable to break Ahed, the Israeli military arrested 10 other Palestinians from Nabi Saleh, 8 of them children. These children also remained steadfast and refused to allow the military to coerce them into giving false testimony to indict Ahed.

Hence, the prosecutor did not have enough evidence to indict Ahed, which made it difficult to complete here trial, especially while it was garnering significant international attention.

(2) Ahed’s case created massive global uproar from citizens to diplomats: millions around the world watched in shock as a 16 year old girl was terrorized, and Israel failed to spin the story.

After a massive right-wing Israeli campaign calling for the arrest, and sometimes even murder, of Ahed, which was followed by her arrest, Ahed quickly became a symbol of Palestinian children. 

Dozens of media networks flocked to cover her story, and in so doing shed a spotlight on the detention of Palestinian children in Israeli military courts. Over 1.75 million people around the world took action with Avaaz and demanded that Ahed and Palestinian children be released. Amnesty and Human Rights Watch joined her campaign — and news networks from the BBC to Xinhua, and from CNN to Al Jazeera reported her story.

In an effort to spin the story in Israel’s favor, former Israeli Ambassador to the United States, Michael Oren, claimed that the ‘Tamimi family were actors’, which journalists did not buy. Oren further claimed that the Knesset had a committee investigating the “authenticity” of the family, which was quietly ridiculed in diplomatic circles as a sign of Israel’s paranoia and its inability to humanize Palestinians.

In a last ditch effort to defame the Tamimi family, 15 year old Mohammad Tamimi, whose skull was shattered when a soldier shot him in his face, was arrested. Ahed slapped the soldier because she heard her cousin Mohammad was shot and in critical condition — and that story intensified global support for her case. The Israeli military interrogated Mohammad and successfully coerced him into saying he got his head injury (a third of his skull was missing and he needed surgery to replace it) from falling off of a bicycle. Major General Yoav Mordecai posted Mohammad’s “confession” on his Facebook page. However, the Tamimi family quickly released x-rays, footage, and hospital records that proved without a doubt that Mohammad was shot, forcing the military to retract.

Mohammad Tamimi — skull shattered by a bullet fired from an Israeli soldier during protests in Nabi Saleh. His injury led Ahed to confront, and slap, the soldiers firing at kids from her home’s front porch.

Diplomatically, many nations that were already worried about the ill-treatment of Palestinian children in Israeli military prisons spoke up. The EU said it was “deeply concerned” about the arrest of minors. Diplomats from around the world were mobilised to watch Ahed’s hearing, with representatives from Germany, France, Belgium, Spain, and many others attending her trial.

(3) Ahed’s arrest was supposed to deter Palestinian youth but instead it inspired them to organise

The Israeli military hoped that the arrest of Ahed would deter the youth of Nabi Saleh (Ahed’s village) and Palestinians across the region from protesting. What happened was the opposite: The youth were inspired by Ahed’s agency, and protests in Nabi Saleh and elsewhere became larger and more intense.

Youth from the villages around Nabi Saleh also joined its protests. And Palestinian students began the process of organising a #March_for_our_freedom. Fearing further upheaval, and unwilling to make Ahed a bigger hero, the Israeli military was forced to give in and drop 8 of the charges against Ahed. Instead of spending over 3 years in prison based on what they had initially pursued, she will now be out in July — early enough to go to her first year in college. The only thing she was booked for were the things in the video — slapping a soldier and calling for protests. They dropped the charge of inciting to bombings and stabbings for her and her mother, and the charge of stone throwing. For the next 4 months in prison, Ahed will focus on her studies and take her final year exam.

It is essential that we tell Ahed’s story as it is, one of steadfastness in prison and a failure by the military to break her. In court, Ahed said: “There is no justice under occupation.” She’s right, and that’s why this plea deal, as unfair as it is, was the best she could hope for and the biggest possible compromise the Israeli military, under pressure, could give. There are 356 children, all like Ahed, still in military confinement. Every year over 750 children are arrested. Let’s continue to take action until they are all free.

Check out the HUGE campaign to free Ahed and all Palestinian children here: 

Wednesday, 21 March 2018

EXCLUSIVE: David Collier – the ‘Independent Researcher’ who accused Corbyn of anti-Semitism keeps company with White Supremacists, Neo-Nazis and Islamophobes

How the British Press were willing dupes of an arch-racist 

Update - Collier Responds
Collier is pained - 'why is everyone attacking me'
Well perhaps it's because you insist on hanging out with neo-Nazis and fascists who support Israel - Tommy Robinson, Paul Besser and their mutual friend Hoffman.  That's why.  No noone in the Palestine solidarity movement promotes 'hard core antisemitism' or porn for that matter!

Racists don't last long in an anti-racist movement whereas you Zionists mix with all sorts of White Supremacists.  And your statistics are phony Collier just like you.

EDL supporter and friend of Tommy Robinson, settler racist Dr Brian John Thomas with 'researcher' David Collier

Collier is always begging for money to fund his fake 'research' and extravagant lifestyle
David Collier passes himself off as an ‘independent researcher’ into anti-Semitism. In reality he is a far-Right Zionist activist whose sole purpose is to smear and defame Palestine solidarity activists, especially Jewish anti-Zionists, as ‘anti-Semitic’.  His latest effort targeted Jeremy Corbyn too.  However fooling the British press - from the Guardian's Jessica Elgot (ex Zionist Chronicle) to the Tory tabloids is easy.

The Guardian was fooled by Collier's claims
Huffington Post, founded by Andrew Breitbart, who also founded Steve Bannon's Breitbart News, which combines White Supremacy with ardent Zionism - HuffPost is little different - pro-Zionist and racist - it uncritically describes Collier as an 'antisemitism campaigner' rather than a racist who denies there are such things as Palestinians
Another anti-racist newspaper which is concerned about 'anti-Semitism' in the Labour Party

Even the so-called serious press take for granted Collier’s claims to be ‘independent’. Yet even he accepts that ‘the quality of my early posts was highly questionable.’  In fact all his posts are highly questionable.

This article should be read in conjunction with my introductory article:  The Lies of David Collier (Gnasher Jew) and his Dodgy Dossiers - Why are the BBC, the Guardian and the press repeatedly taken in by this bogus ‘Researcher’ & his attacks on Corbyn? which was an initial reaction to Collier’s investigation into the Palestine Live Facebook Group, which he maintains is at the centre of an anti-Semitic conspiracy. 

In Palestine Live Part 1 Collier claims that he ‘sets the bar’ for anti-Semitism ‘unnaturally high’. He claims that if he had used the IHRA definition of anti-Semitism, which conflates anti-Zionism and anti-Semitism, then anyone calling Israel a Nazi state would be defined as antisemitic.  In other words virtually everyone in the Palestine Live group would have been an anti-semite. 
(see Defining Anti-Semitism by former Court of Appeal Judge Sir Stephen Sedley) 

In fact the IHRA does not say this. It is merely one of 11 illustrative examples which are not part of the IHRA definition.  The Introduction to these examples states that: 

Contemporary examples of antisemitism in public life, the media, schools, the workplace, and in the religious sphere couldtaking into account the overall context, include, but are not limited to Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis.’
The IHRA Secretariat confirm in an email that the 11 examples Collier refer are not part of the definition of antisemitism

Collier’s dishonesty, failing to mention that even according to the IHRA, the conflation of Israeli policies with the Nazi only could be antisemitic is an example of the dishonest methods he uses throughout the Report. Collier’s Report is a political polemic dressed up as academic research.

Collier is a brazen liar who is only allowed to get away with it by a media that allows him to. Collier reflects their prejudices. Anyone who seriously examines his ‘Reports’ cannot help but conclude that yes he finds some anti-Semitism but that his main purpose is to label all support for the Palestinians as anti-Semitic, especially Jewish anti-Zionism.

Collier fails to contextualise the anti-Semitism he does find, using it instead to reinforce his own Zionist narrative.  By contextualisation I mean this. If you say that everything the Israeli state, a self-defined Jewish state, does is on behalf of all Jews, then some people will believe you and react accordingly.  If the so-called representative body of British Jews, the Board of Deputies, claims Israel’s actions are on behalf of British Jews, then some people will believe them and become anti-Jewish. What this really amounts to is the creation of anti-Semitism by Zionism.  But for Israel there would be no such reactions. 

Likewise if you use the Holocaust, not in order to teach about the evils of racism but to justify racism and every barbarous act of Israel, including ethnic cleansing, is it surprising that some people deny that there was a Holocaust?  The responsibility for the increase in Holocaust denial is that of a Zionist movement whose propaganda museum in Israel, Yad Vashem, makes a point of ensuring that every visiting diplomat pays a visit in order that it can be emphasised that Israel is the answer to the genocide of European Jews.  So even openly anti-Semitic politicians like MEPs Michal Kaminski and Robert Zile are shown around.  They even have a special exhibition wall devoted to the long forgotten (except by the Zionists) Mufti of Jerusalem.  But I digress.

After having disclaimed his intention of following normal Zionist practice of equating anti-Zionism and anti-Semitism, in the remaining 279 pages of his Report Collier does just that. Collier relies on the laziness of the average journalist to sit down, read and critically analyse his Report. Collier understands that most journalists, in eager pursuit of an anti-Corbyn article, will abandon what few critical faculties they possess.

If Collier was being truthful about setting the bar high in terms of anti-Semitism, then the question arises as to why Naomi Wimborne-Iddrissi, Asa Winstanley of Electronic Intifada, Glyn Secker, Mike Cushman, Leah Levane, myself and other Jewish anti-Zionists appear in this Report. At no stage does he quote anything we have said which is anti-Semitic. He relies entirely on guilt by association and inferences. The only conclusion is that Collier’s sole purpose is to smear Palestine solidarity activists and in particular Jewish anti-Zionist activists with the brush of anti-Semitism. Indeed he has a section on The Jewish anti-Zionists (page 87, Part 2) coupled with a little chart to show who is who.

Collier provides a map of some prominent Jewish anti-Zionists and which groups they belong to.  It matters not that it is inaccurate, what it demonstrates is that his real agenda has nothing  to do with anti-Semitism
The Daily Mail, the paper wot supported Hitler in his time, is most concerned about 'antisemitism' in the Labour Party
It is not just the Guardian which treats Collier as a neutral ‘businessman’. Huff Post calls him an ‘anti-Semitism campaigner’. To the Mail be is just a ‘blogger.’ Which is somewhat more accurate. This is not simply journalistic laziness. What the Press are interested in is fanning the flames of the false anti-Semitism narrative. In doing this they know that they can count on the complicity of Labour’s Compliance Unit and Sam Matthews who immediately suspended Glyn Secker of Jewish Voice for Labour.

Collier - Member of Neo-Nazi Facebook Group International Community

Jeremy Corbyn has been attacked for being a member of a Facebook Group on which a tiny handful of anti-semites posted.  The Zionist charity Campaign Against Antisemitism has even made a complaint about Jeremy to the Labour Party for antisemitism!

The strange thing though is if Jeremy Corbyn is anti-semitic because he was a member of a Facebook group which contained anti-semites, then David Collier, in addition to being an Anti-Arab racist is also an anti-Semite! Collier is a member of the International Community Facebook group.  It regularly hosts anti-Semitic world Jewish conspiracy stuff such as 'Lennin (sic) and Stalin All Mass Murderers!  All Jewish!'. (neither was!)  This is obviously anti-Semitic.

The post underneath is even clearer.  The real holocaust was the holocaust of 15m Germans.  By the Jews of course. 

Collier was added to this Facebook group by one Debra Cohen who is no slouch herself.  According to her Ratko Mladic and Radovan Karadic, Serbians who were found by the International Criminal Court at the Hague to be war criminals are innocent.  Why?  It was Muslims whom they butchered and put into concentration camps.

Of course it may be that Collier wasn't aware of these posts, though it is clear he and Cohen know each other.  But according to the logic he deploys against others he is an out and out neo-Nazi!!

The far-Right Zionist group Campaign for Truth hosted a 'debate' with Melanie Phillips and an assortment of racists and oddballs - David Hirsh of Engage, who is a Labour Zionist 'moderate' was happy to take part
Collier Takes Part in a Far-Right Zionist 'Debate' on the Palestinians with Mel Phillips

Even by Zionist standards, and I set the bar pretty high, Collier is an extremist and a racist. In a ‘debate’ organised by the far-Right Zionist Campaign for Truth, Collier spoke on a far—Right panel that included Melanie Phillips, David Hirsh (the ‘moderate’), and Brian John Thomas (the fascist admirer of the EDL and friend of Tommy Robinson). Collier stated: 
‘The Palestinian refugee was forged as a weapon.  It was created as an artificial entity inside a paradigm of No to Normalisation and it cannot exist outside that paradigm.  It will do everything it can to stop any type of settlement.  And today, as demographics have changed in the West, this weapon has taken camp here too.  Today it spearheads BDS.  Another external weapon that does not care about the people inside Gaza or the West Bank...You scrap the ridiculous definition of the refugee.  You scrap UNWRA.... Taking an addict and feeding his addiction.’   (6:09) 
In other words the Palestinian refugees, the victims of ethnic cleansing and massacre, are a myth. Even Zionist historians such as Benny Morris accept that the refugees were expelled in order to create a Jewish majority state. Collier’s methodology is that of Holocaust denial.

Why Collier’s Report on Palestine Live is not worth the paper it is written on
Collier provides a link to a blog by me on how a large part of Orthodox Jewry maintain that the Holocaust was god’s punishment. It is a fact that for Orthodox Jewry everything that happens is preordained by god, the holocaust included. Collier infers that I am anti-semitic for saying this.  Collier repeats that I was expelled from the Labour Party, without explaining its relevance to a Report on ‘anti-Semitism’ with the obvious inference that it was for anti-Semitism whereas it was, of course, for anti-Zionism.  This too is his methodology.

One of the main purposes of Collier’s Report is to mount a crude attack on Jewish anti-Zionists. Collier admits that ‘these activists are not going to be found sharing or liking Rothschild Conspiracy or Holocaust denial posts...’   

Collier argues that ‘It is also confusing for people who are not Jewish’ to be confronted with Jews who are not Zionists. He writes that ‘Nothing will stifle the voice of someone who is not Jewish sticking up for Israel, better than one of these people will.’  What is Collier’s conclusion? ‘Quite disgracefully they weaponise antisemitism.’ At this point pots and kettles come to mind!

But even if Collier is correct, since he accepts Jewish anti-Zionists don’t share Holocaust Denial or Rothschilds posts, why are they in a Report that is only concerned with anti-Semitism not anti-Zionism? The answer of course is obvious. The Report is a dishonest attempt to use ‘anti-Semitism’ in order to attack anti-Zionists, especially Jewish anti-Zionists. 

Collier says that 'the clearest example of legitimising antisemitism' was a meeting at the House of Commons yet he fails to explain what it was said that was anti-Semitic!  Yet this is supposed to be a 'research Report' that sets the bar for anti-semitism 'unnaturally high'!

Collier employs classic McCarthyite guilt-by-association techniques. He describes FSOI as being ‘a group of Palestine Live members, who created FSOI to deflect accusations of anti-Semitism.’  

There is no connection at all between FSOI, which consists primarily of Jewish anti-Zionist activists and which has its own Facebook group and the Palesine Live Facebook group. The fact that a minority of FSOI members may also be members of Palestine, along with a few thousand other people, is irrelevant. They may also be members of the same golf club. 

There is not the slightest shred of evidence that FSOI and PL are one and the same but this confusion of groups is essential if Collier is to demonise FSOI and JVL, which is his real purpose. Collier also slips in the assertion that FSOI was created to ‘deflect accusations of anti-Semitism’.  No it was formed to rebut false accusations of anti-Semitism.  
Collier with Paul Besser, 'Intelligence' Officer of Britain First whose fuhrers Paul Golding (bottom right) and Jayda Fransen have just been gaoled for a total of 54 weeks for racial harassment
Apparently it's anti-semitic, as well as'vicious' to blow the whistle on fascist Zionists
Collier was rattled by the article I published on December 5th 2017 naming 31 Zionist Fascists who went around London deliberately disrupting Palestine meetings, attempting to halt a Balfour march by PSC and in at least one case assaulting people attending a meeting. People who are named are both Jewish and non-Jewish but in any event their religion is irrelevant, it is their politics and activities that concerned me. 

This article is described as ‘vicious’ by Collier.  An adjective best applied to his own 'Reports'. A more accurate description would be truthful. However we know that those, Collier included, named in the article have been much put out by it and that it has caused them severe problems as well as embarrassment being named alongside for example Paul Besser, Britain First Intelligence Officer.  Again the question arises, what has this to do with anti-Semitism, Collier’s apparent target?

At SOAS some of Collier's Zionist friends disrupted a meeting on anti-Semitism

'Tony must know about the level of antisemitism'  Actually no.  It was very small and I didn't participate in any discussions, as Collier would know if his research was up to anything!
Collier’s only attempt to explain my presence in his Report is that I have been a member of PL and therefore ‘must have known’ about the few anti-Semitic posts. He gives no evidence for this assertion and it is simply wrong. I only used the group to publicise my own blog. I never participated in discussions until after his Report was issued. I knew nothing of such posts and because they were so infrequent it was unlikely that I would do so. Collier’s assumptions are speculative. This too is indicative of his methodology.
More to the point, Collier ‘must have known’  that the people he mixes with are associates of fascists and Jewish Nazis like Roberta Moore and her boyfriend Robert Jonge, Paul Besser and Jonathan Hoffman of EDL/JDL fame.

Hoffman with Thor Halland

David Collier with Jonathan Hoffman (left).  Hoffman was excorted out of a meeting at the House of Commons by the Police last year and above at a university meeting

Hoffman with EDL/JDL supporter Kay Wilson and her brother Ian Wilson 
Jonathan Hoffman, who specialises in shouting down speakers, is inquiring about the email of Jason Silver, (above) one of the gang of 31, who committed suicide a couple of months ago having been put up to making false complaints about Palestine Expo to the Police.  Hoffman's purpose was to help instigate the malicious complaints of 'antisemitism' to the Police.  

Silver's false complaint to the Police
You can see from these exchanges the depth of the racism:
'doubt you would get far with the Policeman... wasn't he Muslim?'
'try Britain First... to see if they will load your video, then you will then see who is racist and who supports your case!'
 Mel Gharial adds that that well known anti-racist Tommy Robinson 'has also publicised this I see'

Jason Silver being egged on to  make a malicious and false complaint to the Met, in the belief he was thrown out of Palestine Expo because he was Jewish - despite his wife Claire trying to calm him down.  Even Lawyers for Israel refused to take his case on as it was obvious that he was thrown out of Palestine Expo for being a racist, not for being Jewish

Another person who features in Collier’s Report is Alan Maddison. His ‘crime’? He was the ‘academic enabler’ and he shared my posts and those of Jackie Walker. Also he worked with a 90 year old Jewish Dr Glatt who heavily criticised John Mann MP for his attacks on Corbyn. Glatt ‘absurdly’ supported Ken Livingstone according to Collier. What does Ken Livingstone have to do with anti-Semitism, given that the bar for anti-Semitism has been set so ridiculously high? Nothing unless of course Livingstone’s statement about Hitler supporting Zionism is anti-Semitic.
Collier's assertion is not borne out by the Report - but it served its purpose of fooling a gullible press
Collier, knowing full well the stupidity and gullibility of most journalists, states in his Introduction that ‘you would have to work hard at it’ to be included in his ‘research’. On the contrary, it takes no effort at all. Far from ‘setting the bar for anti-Semitism unnaturally high’ Collier ensured that just about anyone who criticises the Israeli state would be tripped up by his bar.

As for Collier’s claim that his research is ‘fully independent’ by his own admission it has been funded by the far-Right Jewish Human Rights Watch. Collier is about as independent as a dog on a leash.

Another example of ‘anti-Semitism’ that rankled with Collier was the fact that Jackie and I refused him admission to the JVL meeting at Labour Party conference. It was not as he alleged because he was a Zionist but because he specialises in defaming supporters of Palestine. His Report confirms our prognosis. 

Neil Horan - An Open Hitler Admirer
Horan on another Zionist demonstration outside the Albert Hall

Neil Horan demonstrating against 'anti-Semitism' with Paul Besser of Britain 1st (left) and Hoffman (blue anorak with hood behind) - part of the 'Neo-Nazis against Anti-Semitism' group that Collier has formed
A regular feature at Zionist demonstrations is Neil Horan.  He was part of those trying to halt the Balfour demonstration in November 2017.  What is strange is that those who are so busy fighting 'anti-Semitism' welcome on their demonstrations Neil Horan, a Christian Zionist, who is on record as believing that Hitler 'was a good leader who was following the word of Christ.'  Still, when you lie down with dogs you get up with fleas.

Collier Speaks to the Fascist Herut UK
Collier seen here at the founding meeting of Herut-UK giving a talk on the founder of Revisionist Zionism Ze'ev Jabotinsky - a 'moderate' fascist like Collier
Aryeh Miller, CEO of the Zionist Federation speaking

Mandy Blumenfeld speaking - she chaired the meeting

 solicitor Mark Lewis speaking

Collier’s Links with the Zionist Far-Right and Fascists

At the founding meeting of Herut UK on 18th February 2018, David Collier was one of the speakers, alongside Arieh Miller, CEO of the Zionist Federation, Mark Lewis (a media solicitor better known for acting against News Group) with Mandy Blumenfeld as Chair. Collier's talk was on the founder of Revisionist Zionism, whom even David Ben-Gurion called Vladimir Hitler.

Jabotinsky, reached an agreement with Mussolini in 1934 to establish the Beitar Naval Academy at Civitavechia in Italy. , They trained with Mussolini's fascists.  Collier referred during his talk to Jabotinsky's famous essay the Iron Wall, which he wrote in 1923.  Jabotinsky's theme was that the Zionists should not give an inch to the indigenous inhabitants of Palestine. But at least Jabotinsky was honest. 

Today Zionists talk about Zionism as a 'national liberation movement' of the Jews.  Jabotinsky had no regard for such nonsense.  He was an honest colonialist.  
'My readers have a general idea of the history of colonisation in other countries. I suggest that they consider all the precedents with which they are acquainted, and see whether there is one solitary instance of any colonisation being carried on with the consent of the native population. There is no such precedent.... Every native population in the world resists colonists as long as it has the slightest hope of being able to rid itself of the danger of being colonised.'
The reason that Collier is an admirer of Jabotinsky is that he made no pretence of wishing to negotiate with the Arabs.  It was in his mind futile.  All that mattered was who was stronger.  This is pure fascist ideology. This is the man Collier admires. The same is true of Collier's attitudes to the Palestinians today.  Those who see him as some kind of neutral 'researcher' are fools, knaves or idiots - and in the case of the Guardian probably all three!

Other Rogues and Knaves
Thor Halland's charge sheet from the Thai Police

Collier is part of a small rabidly Zionist group, with the discredited clown Jonathan Hoffman, Walter Mitty fantasist Paul Besser of Britain First, Thor Halland who is wanted by the Thai Police for extortion and convicted small-time Salford gangster Michael English. This is in addition to hard-core antisemites and Islamophobes and deranged and frustrated white supremacist supporters of Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer such as South African Sharon Klaff and Ambrosine Shitrit.  People who gather together to convince themselves that it’s all about antisemitism, and not Israel, the criminal and racist Zionist settler colonial state and its oppression of the Palestinians. [Halland denies the accusations of extortion in Thailand and in the interests of balance you might want to see his defence]

These are a group of Zionists so extreme that they are shunned even by the main Israeli propaganda group BICOM, Jonathan Arkush and the Jewish Board of Deputies and even by the disgraced Jeremy Newmark of the Jewish Labour Movement. Yet this is of no concern to the British press. The Guardian’s role in this is particularly despicable.

Sample post where  (1) Michael English threatens Joseph Cohen and (2) Joseph Cohen refers disparagingly to poodle-loving Mike Davidsohn and his Poodles Joseph Cohen insults Davidsohn by calling him “A prejudiced Poodle-breeding pensioner”

It is impossible to do justice to this in one blog. You have to read what I published in December “We Name the Gang Of 31 Zionists. and the following exposes – from Thor Halland’s past in Pattaya,Thailand, jailbird Michael English threatening to tear the head off pretentious Joseph Cohen, another Zionist extremist, to the vile anti-Palestine racism of poodle-lover and dogging afficiando Mike Davidsohn and his feud with Joseph Cohen of the troubled Israel Advocacy Movement.
Now living near Ilford, Collier was born in the UK in the 1960’s and spent 19 years in Israel between 1987 and 2006. Collier claims to have run his own tourism-related business there but is remarkably reticent on why he had to leave Israel although he professes a great love for the settler state. Oddly, for whatever reason, it appears he has not returned there in recent years.
Brian Thomas defends inviting Tommy Robinson to tour Israel with him
Brian John Thomas invited Tommy Robinson to Israel and has close links to the EDL. Tommy Robinson, founder of the EDL and latterly UK Pegida (left), Kenna in the middle runs a far-Right Zionist blog, Brian John Thomas (right).

Tommy Robinson with Kay Wilson, his tour guide
Brian John Thomas, aka Dr Brian of London – a Friend of Collier’s and Tommy Robinson

Collier is a very close associate of far-Right Zionist settler extremist Brian John Thomas who is also a friend of Tommy Robinson, aka Stephen Christopher Lennon, a fixture on Britain’s Islamaphobic far-Right. Thomas spoke with Collier on a Campaign4truth event organised by Shitrit and Klaff.  Even Jonathan Arkush, the right-wing President of the Board of Deputies and the Board itself shun C4T, Shitrit and Klaff  and have refused to speak at their poorly-attended events. Thomas writes on the ISRAELLYCOOL blog and on Twitter as Dr. Brian of London.   In the video he states:
‘I toured Israel with Tommy, in fact Tommy toured Israel with me, I’ve known Tommy for a long time, back to the early days of the EDL.  I watched the EDL very carefully.  I knew that they were good or at least I knew Tommy and those around him were good from early on. I just knew it.’

 Kay Wilson - the acceptable fascist

Aryeh Miller having just introduced Kay Wilson
 Besides being the tour guide for Dr Brian's tour of Israel with Tommy Robinson, Kay Wilson poses as a victim of terrorism in order to justify Israeli terrorism. Wilson sent a letter to the Cambridgeshire Police which was a character reference testifying to Robinson having 'devoted his life to speaking out' against Islam.  
Jonathan Arkush addressing the Zionist counter-demo at the Al Quds demonstration - in the front are Moore and Jonge of the neo-Nazi JDL and Mandy Blumenfeld is there along with Peace not Hate posters!

Her fascist links didn't stop her speaking at a Board of Deputies rally against the annual Al Quds demonstration which has been held for over 30 years without incident (except when the Zionists try to attack it!).  She was introduced by Aryeh Miller, CEO of the Zionist Federation.  Jonathan Arkuss and Paul Charney, Chairman of the Zionist Federation also spoke at the rally. 

A character witness letter sent to Cambridge Police by Brian Thomas's tour guide to Israel Kay Wilson

And here we seen Kay Wilson 'giving a hug' to Neil Masterson, who served 16 months in prison for violently attacking, for no other reason other than a hatred of free speech, George Galloway MP.  Clearly there are some forms of terrorism that this despicable woman approves of.  What is remarkable is that leading Zionist and 'Jewish' bodies in this country give a platform to her.

Paul Charney and Aryeh Miller of the Zionist Federation alongside a member of the EDL in his paramilitary uniform

David Collier and Zionist Clown Jonathan Hoffman.
Hoffman is frequently ejected from Palestine events he attends with Collier (but Collier sits apart from him as he is “working undercover”).

 David Collier and Thor Halland

Halland is part of the small group of extremist Zionists often seen with Collier and Hoffman at anti-Palestine events. On numerous occasions at these events he has had to be restrained by Police. A video news report of Halland under arrest in Pattaya, Thailand for Robbery, kidnapping and extortion cannot be shown in the UK for legal reasons but we have been given a copy. He has also been recorded shouting antisemitic abuse at pro-Palestine Jews, including an elderly Rabbi.
Out soon. My next report covers the bitter internal feud between these Zionist extremists that erupted since I named and shamed them. Joseph Cohen of the Israel Advocacy Movement tried to distance himself from Mike Davidsohn, Gemma and Solly Sheridan, Michael English, Thor Halland, Nutter Neal Cohen of Herut, Sharon Klaff and Ambrosine Shitrit.